Talk:Ian Roderick Macneil

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Impressed.[edit]

Blimey, who wrote this?! Wikidea 23:59, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:79.69.241.65 wrote the bulk of it - someone using Tiscali UK as their ISP. Also interesting that User:AustenBA features heavily in the history, when a Richard Austen-Baker is among the references cited. I would note that as per WP:Conflict of interest, Editors with COIs are strongly encouraged to declare their interests, even when as here, contributions seem to be reasonably WP:NPOV. Le Deluge (talk) 00:34, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have done quite a bit of work on this page, though I'm not sure whether I added the references to the two Journal of Contract Law articles I wrote. I'm not all that keen on being reminded of the 2004 article - I think there were some good points made, but my views on other things have changed quite a lot and I would rather have some distance from that particular piece - so I think this was actually probably someone else's doing, but I could be wrong about that. Either way, these are peer-reviewed articles and relevant to the section in which they appear, alongside the works of a number of other scholars in the field. Certainly I don't want to promote myself, but I have done quite a bit of work on relational contract theory and particularly the work of Macneil, so some reference at some point is probably inevitable in such a long and detailed entry. I doubt any incidental "benefit" would be thought in this case to outweigh the interests of wikipedia, as per the COI policy. I'm sorry, though, that ignorance of this policy led me to fail to draw attention to the connexion on the talk page - a genuine oversight.Austenba (talk) 15:17, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ian Roderick Macneil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ian Roderick Macneil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:02, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]