Talk:Ian Roderick Macneil

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Clans of Scotland Low‑importance

	This article is supported by the Clans of Scotland WikiProject, which gives a central approach to Scottish clans and related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article Ian Roderick Macneil, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.Clans of ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject Clans of ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject Clans of ScotlandClans of Scotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Impressed.[edit]

Blimey, who wrote this?! Wik idea 23:59, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:79.69.241.65 wrote the bulk of it - someone using Tiscali UK as their ISP. Also interesting that User:AustenBA features heavily in the history, when a Richard Austen-Baker is among the references cited. I would note that as per WP:Conflict of interest, Editors with COIs are strongly encouraged to declare their interests, even when as here, contributions seem to be reasonably WP:NPOV. Le Deluge (talk) 00:34, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have done quite a bit of work on this page, though I'm not sure whether I added the references to the two Journal of Contract Law articles I wrote. I'm not all that keen on being reminded of the 2004 article - I think there were some good points made, but my views on other things have changed quite a lot and I would rather have some distance from that particular piece - so I think this was actually probably someone else's doing, but I could be wrong about that. Either way, these are peer-reviewed articles and relevant to the section in which they appear, alongside the works of a number of other scholars in the field. Certainly I don't want to promote myself, but I have done quite a bit of work on relational contract theory and particularly the work of Macneil, so some reference at some point is probably inevitable in such a long and detailed entry. I doubt any incidental "benefit" would be thought in this case to outweigh the interests of wikipedia, as per the COI policy. I'm sorry, though, that ignorance of this policy led me to fail to draw attention to the connexion on the talk page - a genuine oversight.Austenba (talk) 15:17, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ian Roderick Macneil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100305181003/http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/obituaries/Obituary-Ian-Macneil-Clan-chief.6089636.jp to http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/obituaries/Obituary-Ian-Macneil-Clan-chief.6089636.jp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ian Roderick Macneil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070322200542/http://www.scottishfield.co.uk/news/fullstory.php/aid/291/Clan_Macneil.html to http://www.scottishfield.co.uk/news/fullstory.php/aid/291/Clan_Macneil.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:02, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]